| Mon, Nov 2 2009 01:59am CST 1 |

Ross D. Hopkins
2 Posts
|
Being from Australia there is not much to choose from as far as
microlights, other than airborne. Why would you recommend the Air
Creation Tanarg?
|
|
| Mon, Nov 2 2009 02:35am CST 2 |

Bob Thompson
47 Posts
|
A huge question there, but I will try to tell you why I bought the
Tanarg.
I have never flown an Airborne and have been flying trikes since
1995. I started in the UK and have flown many types, but the more
recent ones are P&M machines. The GT460 and the Quik have a old
design of trike. It is small and cramped. The centre of gravity is
too high. The engine mounting frame is too flimsy for the 912
engine.
The Tanarg has a low centre of gravity with a wide track and long
wheelbase, giving very secure ground handling. It is also very
comfortable for both pilot and passenger with all the foot pegs and
the seats being adjustable. The suspension is great. The trike
frame is a very different and strong design and made from stainless
steel. There are numerous safety features built in to the
design.
The downside is that the Tanarg is more expensive than the P&M
machines.
The new Bionix wing is a major breakthrough in trike design and has
a safe speed range with MTOW of 472 kg, of 35 to 85 mph ish. This
design and the features have been patented, so don't expect to see
them on other trikes in the future.
I shall be taking my first flight with the Bionix wing this coming
weekend.
Why not get yourself to the Australian Aircreation dealer and try
for a trail flight.
|
|
| Mon, Nov 2 2009 03:33am CST 3 |

Richard Coutts
1 Posts
|
I don't own a trike, but have been training on an Airborne
XT-912. I do like the look and specs of the
Tanarg. However, whilst my instructor does rate Air
Creation Trikes he (and a couple of other Airborne owners I have
spoken to) feel that a lot of the oversees trike don't seem to
handle the Australian conditions as well as Airborne
trikes. I take this this a grain of salt as one of
the chaps is an Airborne dealer. They also feel that
there is not the same level of support/backup/ease of getting
spares etc with most of the other makes, unlike
Airborne. I don't think there is much of a second
hand market here for Air Creations trikes.
If, and when I am in the market for a NEW trike I will certainly
be looking closely as the Tanarg.
|
|
| Mon, Nov 2 2009 08:00am CST 4 |

Mike-in- Thailand
23 Posts
|
Basically, you get what you pay for. Airborne make great trikes -
my friends Kenny and Paul fly XT912's at my club (with Streak
III's) and they love them! The downside is that they're short of
luggage space and are a little cramped compared to other trikes -
that is, VERY cramped compared to the Tanarg .... the Tanarg is a
3-piece suite on wings! The Tanarg is an extremely solid machine
and I'd dispute that the Airborne would be able to handle rough
weather any better than a Tanarg. Bob's point about the BioniX wing
is very valid and overall, the Tanarg has a "surer" feel than an
Airborne but, the Tanarg costs a shedload more. Again - you gets
what you pays for! Mike
|
|
| Mon, Nov 23 2009 02:00am CST 5 |

Ross D. Hopkins
2 Posts
|
Thank's guy's for your comments. They have been very helpful. I
have nothing against Airborne or any other manufacturer (to each
their own). All are more than likely suitable for their own
particular purpose I would imagine. I think it would eventually
come down to the best for your/my particular purpose. I have
formed the opinion that the Tanarg would be more suited to cross
country & long distance travel as far as comfort &
economy. Would this be the case from your own experience. There
is only one distributor/trainer for the Tanarg in central
Australia. Plenty of Airborne trainers. It might be just me but
the Airborne trainers seem a little blazee as if they seem to
think they have a captive audience or something to that
effect!
Rossco,
|
|
| Mon, Nov 23 2009 03:00am CST 6 |

Bob Thompson
47 Posts
|
Best bet would be to fly both machines and see what you think.
Trouble is Australia is such a huge place that a trip to Chris for
a Tanarg flight might be a long way. Why not call Chris and see if
he knows of any Tanarg owners in your part of Aus who would take
you up?
|
|
| Mon, Feb 1 2010 01:11am CST 7 |

Joel Luyten
8 Posts
|
Ross,
I flew the Airborne XT with the Streak 2 or 3 wing in Paris
before buying my Tanarg. The Airborne is very nice and solid
trike and is comparable to a AC trike from the generation before
the Tanarg. In my eyes it really is a good machine.
But.......the Tanarg is something totally different. I can just
confirm what Bob and Mike are saying.
I would really recommend you to fly the Tanarg before buying
anything. I have seen quite a few people who regreted their
decission after taking a flight with me in the Tanarg. I must say
that 3 years ago when I bought my trike there was almost no price
difference between an Airborne, Quick or GT450 and the Tanarg.
That made it a bit easier for me.
A disadvantage might be the spare parts for you but the guys at
AC are very helpful and send spare parts out all over the
world.
You can not compare the comfort of the Tanarg to anything else.
You have to fly it to believe it.
Does it have a downside? Yes, it does. Its heavier to handle in
the hangar and on the ground to push it in to tight spaces. We
have 50 trikes in our hangar so we need to re-shufle them quite
often. The AC GTE owners are really strugling the first time they
have to move a Tanarg.
The trick is to grab it underneath the nose and lift the front
wheel from the ground. If you put your hand under the nose you
will feel that its designed it for it. Same if you want to push
it around outside on the grass. It feels heavy. Thats the only
disadvantage I can think of really.
Maybe the Airborne is a bit lighter to handle in the air as well.
If you want a "play" trike only then I wouldnt buy a Tanarg but
if you want an alround trike then the Tanarg is the best choice I
think. When I am comletely packed with tent and cooking equipment
etc. you still cant see it from the outside. No bulky lugage on
the passangers seat or anything. Everything goes in to the boot.
The longest flight I did in one day was Chamonix-Brussels 630km.
Started at 0630 in the morning and arrived at 1730. We had
headwind and a lot of turbulence. We made 3 stops to eat and
refuel the 2-strokes. I was surprised how relaxed I was when I
arrived. Great machine.
I have not seen anybody yet who regretted buying a Tanarg. I
could go on and on abouth this machine..........I love it.
Joel
|
|
| Mon, Apr 5 2010 07:23am CDT 8 |

Christopher Van Zyl
21 Posts
|
I own a 1995 Clipper 582 and I have no doubt about were my money
will go if I upgrade to a NEW/ SECONDHAND trike, for me there will
be only one and that is a TANARG. I am 1.97 meters tall and weigh
115 kg so the space and comfort promised by the Tanarg along with
the excellent quality,workmanship and handling has to make it my
ultimate choice! The issue of parts availability really should not
even be on the table as Jean-Luc and the good guys from AC factory
could probably have your parts delivered anywhere in the world just
as fast as your local boys can deliver Air Borne Parts to anywhere
in Oz.
|
|